Commerce City to hold June 15 hearing on Hogan PUD amendment for Chambers Road site
The ordinance would change allowed uses, consolidate planning areas and expand the Hogan Property planned-unit-development boundary to about 16.82 acres near Chambers Road and East 101st Way.
Commerce City council members are scheduled to hold a June 15 public hearing on a Hogan Property planned-unit-development amendment affecting 10230 Chambers Road and 15955 E. 101st Way.
The ordinance would consolidate Planning Areas B through D, modify allowable uses, establish development standards and expand the PUD boundary to about 16.82 acres, according to the city's public-hearing notice. The proposal was introduced on first reading May 18 and set for a second-reading public hearing June 15.
A city council schedule document identifies the applicant as Urban Moment and says the amendment would shift allowable uses in the Hogan PUD from commercial and residential to planned residential development while expanding the boundary eastward. Earlier city ward reports from January and February described the request more specifically as a change from commercial and single-family residential to multi-family residential.
Those city tracking reports also said the amendment was awaiting submittal of a preliminary plat earlier this year, indicating the zoning request is tied to the next stage of subdivision and site review.
The public record available for this story confirms the scheduled hearing and the proposed land-use shift, but it does not fully show how development standards would change or how intensive the residential project could be. The June 15 agenda lists attachments including a staff report, planning commission minutes, a neighborhood-meetings summary, public comment and a traffic impact study, but those materials were not fully accessible in the reporting record reviewed here.
Unlike a separate affordable-housing item on the same agenda, this ordinance would apply only to one planned-unit development and one site near Chambers Road. Council's June 15 action will determine whether the property moves forward under a more residential zoning framework.
As of publication, the available public documents did not independently confirm any second-reading vote or final council action on the ordinance.